Saturday, November 12, 2011

How would you like your eggs?

Mississippi recently held a vote on an amendment to confer protected legal status to fertilized human eggs.  The amendment was rejected by a majority of 55%.  The state's Republican lieutenant governor — now governor-elect — Phil Bryant, who campaigned hard for the measure was quoted as saying "We're saying this child, once conceived, will have an opportunity to have the same rights as you and I have."

I was struck by that comment as I often hear a similar sentiment from pro-life people – I realize that this is an extremely emotional and to many a moral issue.  I see both sides but where I see a disconnect from the pro-life side is their strident belief that they can control other people and claim they are acting in the best interest of fertilized eggs but once those resulting babies are born I don’t see the same commitment.  What if that fertilized egg turns out to be a ……..
Gay child – Mississippi joined 11 states that passed Gay-marriage bans in Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon and Utah.  Amendments banning same-sex marriage were passed earlier this year in Louisiana and Missouri. They joined Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada and Nebraska, whose constitutions define marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
Black - in Mississippi where age gaps between blacks and whites in Mississippi remain substantial. Blacks in Mississippi earn about 69% of what whites earn at the median, among fulltime, year-round workers, while nationally the figure is 80%. The low earnings of black women are particularly striking: this group earns only 69% of the national median for black women, although black men, by contrast, earn 80% as much as their national counterparts. And trends are not promising, based on the most recent data available: the gap between the earnings of whites and blacks in the state widened over the 1999-2006 period.  Nationally, the gap remained the same. http://www.ihl.state.ms.us/urc/downloads/africanamerican_economic.pdf

Poor….Not to mention that Mississippi is among the bottom five states on 11 of the 22 measures.  That fertilized egg faces a high infant mortality rate at 10.3 deaths per 1,000 live births and a high rate of deaths from cardiovascular disease at 373.7 deaths per 100,000 population.  Other challenges for Mississippi face are a high prevalence of obesity at 35.3 percent of the population, a high percentage of children in poverty at 31.9 percent of persons under age 18, a low high school graduation rate with 63.6 percent of incoming ninth graders who graduate within four years, limited availability of primary care physicians with 81.9 primary care physicians per 100,000 population, a high rate of preventable hospitalizations with 97.8 discharges per 1,000 Medicare enrollees. http://www.americashealthrankings.org/yearcompare/2009/2010/MS.aspx.

Or on a more nationwide view -  
A woman – where Wal-Mart discriminates against its female employees in making promotions, job assignments, pay decisions and training, and retaliates against women who complain against such practices.
Or an illegal alien where children whose parents are illegal immigrants or who lack legal status themselves face “uniformly negative” effects on their social development from early childhood until they become adults, according to a study by four researchers published Wednesday in the Harvard Educational Review. The study concluded that more than five million children in the United States are “at risk of lower educational performance, economic stagnation, blocked mobility and ambiguous belonging” because they are growing up in immigrant families affected by illegal status.
Now I am pretty sure that Phil Bryant is none of the above  ......Just saying……. 

3 comments:

  1. I think you're reaching a bit too far here just to attack a Republican, or perhaps you're just not familiar with the concept of "opportunity" and individual "rights" where one can either succeed or fail. This is a totally different idea than you're familiar with - the idea that the govt. will take everyone's money and solve all problems, no matter what you do. BTW: With today's "Super Committee" announcement of failing to reduce the spending gap by a mere < 10%, how's the govt. working out for you?

    I do agree on one point - gay rights. It's beyond me how anyone in the 21st century can really support a ban on gay marriage ... or for gay's rights to openly serve in the military. But you're (once again) glossing over some key facts in your attempt to make a liberal point...

    Blacks/White income comparison - you didn't mention that Black Men/Women are statistically younger than White counterparts in MS (only 15-18% black are 25 and over compared to 31-34% white), and statistically are less educated (68-72% black are HS graduates, compared to 81-84% white ... 9-14% black have Bachelors or Higher compared to 22-23% white). Age/Experience and Education have huge impact on income status. Even today with the high unemployment rates it's at ~14% for those with less than a HS education and only ~4.4% for those with a Bachelors or higher. So it's not a "black/white" thing. Everyone today can go to some college and advance themselves. And, if the OWS protesters get their way - all education will be free. Well, not really "free". Just paid for by those in the higher income brackets that pay for 70% of everything else.

    Your comment on illegal immigration was truly a first for me: "..affected by illegal status" - wow! That's the nicest way I've ever heard an illegal act put. Maybe you can try "illegally challenged" next time. Any way you can make it sound as if these people didn't actually do something illegal in the first place I think could advance your position. Not to me it won't, but that's just because I can read ... but to someone else it might.

    Really? Your position is we should reward their illegal acts by giving them free wellfare, education, medical, and opportunities earned by other law abiding immigrants and US citizens? Then tell me, what would be the point of calling it "illegal"?

    Medina64 -
    I must have missed the point you were making comparing Muslim extremists with pro-life supporters, because to me - it's really obvious. Muslim extremists are constantly plotting and at time successfully killing innocent people. "Whacking" these lunatics would save lives, consistent with a pro-life agenda. I hope you're not saying that the preservation of life for a terrorist is the same as preservation of life for an unborn child ... are you??

    I do feel a lot of sympathy for the Mentally disabled and wish the govt would do more. It could happen to anyone and is largely an unknown science.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Correction - 1.2B is ~8% of the deficit, not the budget. The budget is ~6T, so 1.2B is only 2% of the budget.

    So ... Democrats complain that Bush spent too much, and Republicans complain that Obama is spending too much, yet they can't find 2% in spending cuts!! or in increased revenue!! Too many negative thoughts going through my head ... can't think .... processing .. processing ..

    ReplyDelete